At the same time, intensive work continued on the theory of reference, and the results obtained in that domain were transferred to the analysis of mind. In the last quarter of the century there was a profound shift in emphasis from the topics of meaning and reference to issues about the human mind, including the nature of mental processes such as thinking, judging, perceiving, believing, and intending as well as the products or objects of such processes, including representations, meanings, and visual images. Ethics, aesthetics, religion, and law also were fields of interest, though to a lesser degree. Although analysis can in principle be applied to any subject matter, its central focus for most of the century was language, especially the notions of meaning and reference. There were, of course, many philosophers whose work was influenced by both approaches. The 20th century thus witnessed the development of two diverse streams of analysis, one of them emphasizing formal (logical) techniques and the other informal (ordinary-language) ones. Many philosophers thus regarded the combination of logic and science as a model that philosophical inquiry should follow, though others rejected the model or minimized its usefulness for dealing with philosophical problems. Although there are anticipations of this kind of logic in the Stoics, its modern forms are without exact parallel in Western thought, a fact that is made apparent by its close affinities with mathematics and science. The development of analytic philosophy was significantly influenced by the creation of symbolic (or mathematical) logic at the beginning of the century ( see formal logic). There is probably no major philosophical problem that its practitioners have failed to address. From its inception, analytic philosophy also has been highly problem-oriented. Their varied methods have included the creation of symbolic languages as well as the close examination of ordinary speech, and the objects to be clarified have ranged from concepts to natural laws and from notions that belong to the physical sciences-such as mass, force, and testability-to ordinary terms such as responsibility and see. Philosophers in this tradition generally have agreed with Moore that the purpose of analysis is the clarification of thought. In Principia Ethica (1903) Moore argued that the predicate good, which defines the sphere of ethics, is “simple, unanalyzable, and indefinable.” His contention was that many of the difficulties in ethics, and indeed in philosophy generally, arise from an “attempt to answer questions, without first discovering precisely what question it is which you desire to answer.” These questions thus require analysis for their clarification. Its 20th-century origin is often attributed to the work of the English philosopher G.E. It is difficult to give a precise definition of analytic philosophy, since it is not so much a specific doctrine as an overlapping set of approaches to problems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |